May 15, 2017
From self-driving cars to memory products and server chips, Intel themselves have admitted their renewed focus will be on growing markets where they see a ton of untapped potential. However in a PC market where AMD is once again challenging Intel after many years, the company won't be letting go that easily.
We know for a fact Intel's eighth-generation Core CPUs will remain on the 14nm manufacturing node, and with Ryzen selling like hotcakes, we then heard the rumor that Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X products along with their accompanying X299 chipset were expected to arrive ahead of schedule sometime around early June.
A new leak via Anandtech forums brings more goodies. Code-named Basin Falls, the new quad-core Kaby Lake-X CPUs would get the Core i7 branding, while hexa, octa, 10, and 12-core Skylake-X CPUs would receive the Core i9 moniker. The table below shows what Intel would announce in time for Computex later this month:
Name | Cores/ Threads |
L3 Cache (MB) |
Base clock/ Turbo (GHz) |
PCIe Lanes | Memory | TDP | Launch |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
i9-7920X |
12/24 | 16.5 | TBA | 44 | 4 x DDR4-2666 | 140W or 160W |
August 2017 |
i9-7900X |
10/20 | 13.75 |
3.3 / |
44 | 4 x DDR4-2666 | 140W | June 2017 |
i9-7820X |
8/16 | 11 |
4.3 / 4.5 (Turbo 2.0) |
28 | 4 x DDR4-2666 | 140W | June 2017 |
i9-7800X |
6/12 | 8.25 |
3.5 / 4.0 (Turbo 2.0) |
28 | 4 x DDR4-2666 | 140W | June 2017 |
i7-7740K |
4/8 | 8 |
4.3 / 4.5 (Turbo 2.0) |
16 | 2 x DDR4-2666 | 112W | June 2017 |
i7-7640K |
4/4 | 6 |
4.0 / 4.2 (Turbo 2.0) |
16 | 2 x DDR4-2666 | 112W | June 2017 |
Core count matters apparently, just ask AMD who is rumored to be coming up with a 16 core chip soon. However i9 chips are said to feature a third clock state called Turbo Clock 3.0, which would allow for even higher clocks in single threaded tasks.
The most potent of Intel upcoming chips, the Core i9-7920X appears to be a Core i7 on steroids offering 12 cores (24 threads), 16.5MB of onboard L3 cache and a toasty 140W TDP (a second leak says 160W).
Now, if Intel intends to keep its high-end CPU pricing scheme of $1,000 or above that, this is bound to be an impractical flagship with others actually competing on the mainstream market against Ryzen. We'll find out soon.
Source: TECHSPOT